Skip to main content

tv   Meet the Press  MSNBC  September 19, 2011 4:00am-5:00am EDT

4:00 am
this sunday, the hottest show, the president wants a jobs bill. >> what on earth are we waiting for? >> but republicans are not on board. >> the truth is, the president has a problem that no amount of political strategizing can solve. his economic policies simply haven't worked. >> so another fight is soming over taxes and spending, as poverty is on the rise an voters feel worse off. how can washington help? my lead newsmaker guest this morning, senate republican leader, mitch mcconnell of kentucky. then, from bad to worse, democrats openly gripe about the president, and now question his re-election process. plus an assessment of the republican field challenging mr. obama, and the seventh annual
4:01 am
clinton global initiative is set to kick off in new york. this morning, a special interview with former president bill clinton. finally, our political roundtable. the gop debate, romney versus perry, fighting about social security. >> it's not going to be there into the future. and i don't have a -- i don't make any apologies for calling the program what it is. >> social security is not a ponzi scheme. >> the race for the white house and the politics of the economy. joining us, former democratic governor of michigan jennifer granholm. republican strategist alex castellanos. white house correspondent for "the new york times." helene cooper. senior political analyst for "time" magazine, mark halperin. good morning. after weeks of taking his case on the road and urging congress
4:02 am
to pass his jobs bill tomorrow the president will lay out his plan to reduce the deficit. "the new york times" reporting this morning that president obama will call for a new minimum tax rate for millionaires and will dub the proposal the buffett rule in reference to billionaire warren buffett who has advocated that the superrich should pay their fair share taxes. what are the prospects among republicans? what sort of plan is realistic in the midst of this election cycle. here with us for two live interviews, the republican leader of the senate, mitch mcconnell, and former president of the united states, bill clinton. leader mcconnell, let me start with you and ask you whether this president's plan on a millionaires' tax rate is something that you could support? >> well, you know, we had that vote, david. a couple of years ago, when the democrats basically owned the congress. they had overwhelming control of the senate and the house, and it was defeated then. so i would simply go back to what the president said last december and signing a two-year extension of the current tax rates is a bad thing to do in the middle of an economic
4:03 am
downturn. and of course the economy somewhat argues even worse now than it was when the president signed the extension of the current tax rates back in december. i think what he said then still applies now. >> what's unfair, though, about making richer americans pay the same tax rate that middle income americans do? >> well, look, you know, if warren buffett would like to give us some of his benefits we'd be happy to talk about it. i mean, i think that benefits is one of the ways that we're going to have to solve at least this social security. and medicare problems long-term for the next generation. with regard to his tax rate, if he's feeling guilty about it, i think he should send in a check. but, we don't want to stagnate this economy by raising taxes. it won't just hit individuals, david. you know, there are over 700,000 of our most successful small businesses pay taxes as individuals. not as corporations. that represents 50% of small business income. and 25% of the american workforce. we've got a 9.1% unemployment rate. does anybody think that's a good idea other than the president?
4:04 am
there's bipartisan opposition to what the president is recommending already. >> we're talking about a jobs bill the president wants, and then tomorrow he's going to talk about his larger plan for reducing the deficit, because we know there's a super committee now in washington that still has to make some of the hard choices that congress couldn't make the last go-around. ome of the hard s tt congress couldn't make the last go-around. so the real question, leader, is whether the president has a partner in republicans. now house speaker boehner talked about the economy in both of these issues this week. i want to play what he said on this idea of whether there's a paner. >> we want to create a better environment for jobcreation, politicians of all stripes can leave the, you know, m way or the highway philosophy behind. now on tax increases i think are off the table. and i don't think they're a viable option for the joint committee. >> isn't it classic politicians talking out of both sides of their mouth? we can't have an ultimate im, my
4:05 am
way or the highway, but we will not talk about tax increases as we go forward to try to bring this budget into balance over time. >> well, it never gets talked about but there actually are things we agree on. we passed the budget control act last gust, this past august. it will get us a trill dollars in savings over ten years. we're going to get another minimum of a million -- a trillion, $200 billion savings out of the joint committee. we passed a patent bill that we think will help the economy. this week, we extended the feder federal aviation administration and we passed a highway bill. if the president would send up these trade bills that have been sitting on his desk for 2 1/2 years, ever since the day he was sworn in, we'll pass those. there are things we can do together, david and we're ready to do it. >> let's talk about the hard stuff. because my question is about taxes. if the president is willing to deal on medicare cuts, cuts to that program, are you willing to consider tax increases as part of a larger effort to reduce the deficit? >> well, we're certainly interested in tax reform. i don't have a single member of
4:06 am
my conference who doesn't think it's time to take a whole look at the tax code, a over again. it's been 25 years. since president reagan led us through this effort on a bipartisan basis back in the mid '80s. he got the top rate from 70 down to 28%. was a big step in the right direction and it helped reduce an economic boom for a fairly lengthy period of time. so tax reform we're certainly open to. we're not opposed to more revenue. the way you get more revenue is get the economy going the government is a big winner when the economy is moving. right now, we've got -- we've thrown a big, wet blanket over the private sector economy. we' borrowed too much. we've spent too much. we're dramatically overregulating every aspect of the private sector. in our country. and now we're threatening to raise taxes on top of it. that's not going to get the economy moving. >> isn't the reality, leader, that you laid out the political playbook for republicans, and that's to make this president a one-term president. you laid that out before. is it your view that it's
4:07 am
political malpractice to do business with the president on this point? and by taking any tax increases off the table, to either jump-start the economy or deal with the deficit problem down the road, you say, we're not going to give him anything now. the window is closed, let's have it out in the election? >> no, the window is not closed. i mean the election is next year. in case anybody forgot. it's not this year. we're in the middle now of a process that i think is going to lead to a major bipartisan accomplishment. and that's the joint committee, and its recommendations with regard to entitlement reform and possibly tax reform, as women. only divided government can do those kinds of things, david. let me give you four good examples. president reagan and tip o'neill tix fixed the social security system for a generation in the mid eightys. they did tax reform in the mid '80s. president clinton and the republicans did welfare reform. and president clinton and the republicans actually balanced the budget in the late '90s. you know, divided government, that is when neither party controls the entire government, is the perfect time to do big stuff. and we intend to tackle deficit
4:08 am
and debt, and once again think the joint committee i'm hopeful the president will sign whatever we send him later this year. that will be an accomplishment that both sides can brag about. >> i'm going to ask you about 2012. who do you think is the front-runner on the republican side? >> i have no idea. i have my hands full with my job in the senate. it's interesting to watch. and obviously'm going to be supporting the republican nominee, and i think if the election were very soon, we'd have an excellent chance of changing the occupant of the white house. but, of course, the election is not this is year. as i just indicated. it's next year. >> i want to play a couple of moments from recent debates that had to do wi really a challenge for the notion that the republican party is the party of life. and supports the culture of life. the first question for my colleague brian williams in the debate that had to do with the death penalty to rick perry. i'll show you that. >> your state has execud 234 death row inmates, more than any other governor in modern times. have you -- >> an awkward moment of
4:09 am
applause. and then during the cnn debate, wolf blitzer asked ron paul whether a healthy man who had opted not to get insurance should be allowed to live, frankly, if he required intensive care for a period of six months. here was the congress. >> congressman, are you saying that society should just let him die? >> no. >> yes! >> does the audience response in both cases trouble you as a republican? >> look, we have a lot of people running for president. there are going to be a lot of debates, a lot of things said. a lot of audience reactions. i don't have any particular reaction to what's going on in republican campaign for president right now. i've got a big job to do trying to help turn this country around. and working with a president who i belve has been doing all of the wrong things. i mean, if you look city stimulus bill, david, what did we get out of that? turtle tunnels and solyndra. solyndra. look. more money was lost on solyndra than came to my state to fix
4:10 am
roads and bridges out of the entire stimulus package last year. and now he's asking us to do it again. one of my favorite sayingsere in kentucky, out in the rural areas, is there's no educating the second kick of a mule. we've been there. we've done that. now he's asking us to do it again. i'm trying to get him to go in a different direction. i've got my hands full without commenting on all that's going on in the republican campaigns for president. >> all right we're going to leave it there. leader mcconnell, as always, thank you very much. >> thank you, david. >> joining me now, live fro new york, the 42nd president of the united states, bill clinton. mr. president, welcome back to "meet the press." always nice to have you. >> thank you, david. >> i want to talk about the clinton global initiative, the seventh year as it gets ready to kick off in new york, and there's really interrelationship between the big focus you have at the conference and this debate we're having in washington. first let me get your response, however, to leader mcconnell. you warn now, in this economic clime against cutting too much or raising taxes too much, either dealing with the long-term deficit or
4:11 am
jump-starting the economy. what do you think is possible now when you hear what you just heard? >> well, i don't know. you know, i'm notin washington and i don't have a feel for it. i will say this, if you look at the independent economic analysis of the program the president outlined, a broad range of economists say that if it's adopted, then in 2012, gdp growth will be somewhere between 1.3% and 2% higher than it otherwise would be. unemployment will drop a percent, maybe more than a percent lower than it otherwise would. looks to me like that's a good thing for america. but i doubt that the -- that the republicans want it to happen in 2012. but it's the right thing to do. the average family would get a $1500 tax cut. that would stimulate consumption. and the employers would get significant tax benefits to hire
4:12 am
new people. so ihink -- and there would be $50 billion more put out through the existing government channels for infrastructure projects, stly to fix roads of all kinds. and they would feed an infrastructure bank of $10 million and then get private investors, which the republicans normally like, and even foreign investors could invest in this so we could grow the economy. so i thought it was a good plan that he outnine lined. and i still hope that quite a lot of it will pass because i think it will put americans back to work. >> but, you've heard democrats who are concerned about the impact on taxes. raising taxes in this economy. that's the kind of sustenance that republicans will feed on and say, we just can't do it. and you've warned against it, as well. you think there's too much emphasis on taxing the rich? >> well, first of all, i believe that the -- that as you look at how we're going to balance this budget, and get a hold of the
4:13 am
debt over the long run, clearly eryone has looked at it. all the bipartisan commissions, extremely good work done by alan simpson and erz kin bowles and their commission. they say you've got to have spending cuts and economic growth if you want to bring the budget back into balance. you have to have all three. and the least harmful tax increases are the ones that senator mcconnell, and people who agree with him, hate the most. and that is restoring the tax levels that were through whe i was president for those of us in high income group levels. that's the one that does the least harm. i agree we ought to have corporate tax reform. i agree that in this world, where there's a lot more competition for new manufacturing jobs, we've got to lower the rates, and broaden the base. i think that i would support senator mcconnell's call for a reform of the individual income tax system. right now, we don't need to do
4:14 am
what the republicans want to do, either, which is to cut a lot of government spending that is keeping the economy going. right now, what we need to do is put americans back to work, get growth going, and then bring this debt down. and that's what i think. i think they ought to be cooperating, but conflict seems to want to be better politics. cooperation is better economics. >> let me ask you about your focus at the clinton global initiative this year. because it unemployment. it's not just about the united states, but the world over. 205 million people unemployed, 1.5 billion who are vulnerable, either underemployed or informally employed. as you think about what has to be done, is there not a reality in this country and in the rest of the world that there are people who've benefited from all the upsides of globalization, but there are more people becoming poor in this country, and around the world, because they're just getting the downside of it? >> absolutely. and if you look at that, clearly what every country needs, and
4:15 am
what we need in thinking about the world ishe strategy for shared benefits. look, if you go back to when america moved from farm to factory, at the end of the 19th century, every time you change the economic paradigm, vast new fortunes are made, and you create more jobs, but it's hard on the middle class. and it's hard on people who are doing fine in the old economy. that's basically happening worldwide. there are too many people left out and left behind. and what creates a structure of oprtunity is when you have cooperation between government and the private sector. to essentially make the market work for everybody. hat's what we need to do in america. that's what we need to do in the world. that's what america did to create the biggest middle class in history from the time of theodore roosevelt through franklin roosevelt. that's what works and that's what has to be done today. and it has to be done in
4:16 am
america, to make sure that we have an economy of shared prosperity and shared responsibili responsibility, and it's what we're trying to create in the world. it's what i'm trying to do in the work i do in haiti and it's what the clinton global initiative tries 20 do. >> so talk about what tangible, out of this meeting, because this is a tangible meeting. this is about direct results and not just conversation, what do you get tangibly out of this that's about public/private partnership, at a time when the role of government is under fire, as you know? >> well, there will be -- i think there will be somewhere on the order of $5 billion or $6 billion worth of commitments over a multi-year period to do moreto to, for example, establish women businesses in developing countries where women have not been a full partner in the economy, as well as to send more young girls to school and give them access to the economy. i think that there will be an enormous number of very good commitment to try to use the energy transfer the world is going through to create more
4:17 am
jobs. i heard what senator mcconnell said about that one project. but the hard truth is that in america, in spite of his hostility to it, green technology jobs have grown twice as fast as the overall job genating capacity of the economy in the last eight years, where all job growth has been anemic. you're going to have a lot of that. and in america, i think you'll see some interesting partnerships. the afl-cio and some of the public employee pension funds are looking at this and saying, hey, we're not earning all that much money in the stock market, maybe we should invest in an infrastructure bank. maybe we should invest in putting people back to work, modernizing all these buildings and making them more efficient, because if they do that, we know we're going to get our money back, plus a return. i think you'll see some innovative things that will be a real beacon of what america could do, and do in a hurry, to put itself bk to work if we move the money to where the jobs
4:18 am
are. >> it would be malpractice on my part, mr. president, if i didn't ask you about politics. you know a thing or two about political leadership and about how to get re-elected. so i have to show you what your good pal and old political hand james carville is saying about this president and his troubles. i'll put it up on the screen. what should the white house do now? he writes. one word comes to mind, panic. this is what i would say to president barack obama, the time has come to demand a plan of action that requires a complete change from the direction you are headed. number one, fire somebody. no, fire a lot of people. this may be news t you, but this is not going well. what's going wrong for this president? >> well, first of all, he became president just a few months after the financial crash. now, ke in mind, even before thefinancial crash, in the eight years before the financial
4:19 am
crash, we had almost no new jobs. only 10% as many as we had when i was president. real family income was lower than it was the day i left office. the economy was weak as could be. then you have this financial crisis. istorically, these things take five years to get over. and a year after the president took office, the final figures came in and it turned out that the crash was even worse than anybody thought. so, we don't feel fixed yet. and that's never good for an incoming president. as americans, there's no american alive except the people who are old enough to remember the great depression, and there are not many of them, who remember what it's like to go through a financial crash, which rmally takes four to five years to get over. so he's got a very difficult hand to play. but, if you look at this proposal he's put forward to the american people, and to the congress, all the economic studies say that it will add
4:20 am
basically 1.3% to 2% to gdp growth next year. it will lower unemployment by 1% or more. it would create 1 million to 2 million jobs. i thinke's got a plan now. i think he's on the right track. and i think that the poll numbers don't mean much now. right now he's out there running against himself, and running up against the american people's disappointments and frustrations. look, this is an agonizing time for miions of americans. not just the inemployed, but the people who aren't in the figures because they've gotten so discouraged they quit looking for work. or the people in part-time jobs that need full thy-time jobs to support their families. i think this is all perfectly predictable. and finally he's got a plan that he can push, and if hpushes it, the american people can make their own judgments about how the congress responds, and who's responsible from here on in. but i think he finally got a plan that people can gravitate to. >> should he follow mr. carville's advice?
4:21 am
>> no, because he's got a good economic plan. i don't -- you know, the president never does the country much good by panicking. i know what james meant. james meant that we need a political turn. but the truth is, what we need is to create a climate where the american people can think, instead of just vote their frustrations. and as long as he's got a specific plan out there, and the american people can evaluate it compared to what the republicans want, and see what they do, i think that politically that's the best you can do. he's been dealt a tough hand. and the american people are not used to waiting five years for anything good to happen. but, that's what we're facing. d if you want to speed it up, we've got to do things in the government. so, now we've got -- we're going to have a real debate with real specifics. i think that's encouraging. he's going to come out with his long-term deficit redtion plan. i think that's a good idea.
4:22 am
but he's going to make clear that you can't balance the budget on the back of no growth. so we don't want big tax increases, or spending cuts now. we've got to focus on the jobs first, then we can bring the debt down. >> here's a story from bloomberg news on friday, i'll put it up on the screen. the headline, clinton popularity prompts buyer's remorse. the most popular national political figure in america today is one who was rejected by her own party three years ago, secretary of state hillary clinton. nearly two-thirds of americans hold a favorable view of her and one-third are suffering a form of buyeraries remorse, saying the u.s. would be better off now if she had become president in 2000 eight, instead of barack obama. as my son would say, this is awkward. >> well, first, i'm proud of her, and i think that the american people are right that she's done a really fine job. but she'd be the first to tell you that, you know, the further you get out of the line of fire, the more popular you're likely to be. i don't think you can -- you can
4:23 am
take that seriously. she is very safe, she's not president, he is. we have anconomic plan. th best thing to do is to focus on putting the american people back to work and passing this plan. >> to that point, if unemployment does not come down significantly from 9.1%, you know the history, can this president be re-elected? >> yes, if people believe that he had a credible plan, and the republicans thwarted it, either because they were wrong or they just wted to beat him. that's the problem they're facing. and i know there's a story in the press today saying that the use was going to offer to pass about 2.5% of what the president asked for. about 2.5%. if the story in the paper is right. and if that's true, they've put themselves in a perilous position. they are now opposing the payroll tax cuts that they have always been for. they had to figure out why they
4:24 am
were against that. they're -- they're against them for waing to offset the cost of this with raising taxes on upper-income people. if they don't want to do that now, they should say this is an emergency, and we'll just pass theax cuts right now. it is an emergency. they didn't have any problem at all for 7 1/2 years fighting the wars in iraq and afghanistan off budget and doubling the debt of the country. and all of a sudden now, they can't bear to spend a little money to give the average american a payroll tax cut and the average small business person a payroll tax incentive to hire new people. i think that, you know, we need to clarify the choices here, and settle down. the fundamental problem, avid, that's why i like what i'm doing now, in the global initiative, we have republicans and democrats, and conservatives and liberals and people from all over the world. we just try to do what works. and the fundamental problem that we've got in america today, i think, or parts of the
4:25 am
economics, is that conflict makes good politics. sharp ideology and all this stuff, that's been very successful politically, but it's lousy for economic policymaking. if you look at the places that are really successful in america today, look at silicon valley, look at the computer simulation boom in orlando, and lots of other examples, in those laces, without exception, you have cooperation between a vibrant private sector and a smart government. and cooperation is great for the economy, but it doesn't work as well politically. so we've got this big disconnect between politics and economics, and until we close it we're going to have a hard time coming back. >> mr. president, two quick ones before you go, if i can. so who do you think is the republican nominee? >> i don't know. it's early. right now it looks like governor perry and governor romney are
4:26 am
doing very well. you know, i wouldn't count anything out. it's likely to be an unpredictable year because it's an unpredictable time. >> finally the u.n. vote coming up. palestinians and israelis. as the palestinians seek a vote in the u.n. for statehood, how counterproductive do you think this will be for their ultimate effort to get a palestinian state, given, of course, that the united states will block their efforts in the security council? >> well, everybody knows what's going to happen, and the united states has been very forthright, and i think the palestinians understand that they have to negotiate borders and securities with the israelis. they're just frustrated because they feel that they have provided a secure environment. they have reinforced cooperation with the israelis. they have produced a growing economy on the west bank. they have renounced violence. and all the arab countries except syria have offered israel a political, military and security partnership for the
4:27 am
future, including opposition to iran's nuclear design. if they create a palestinian state, and there's been no progress. so this is an act of frustration by the palestinians. and i think what we've all got to do is contain the negative fallout, so when they get the vote, which will be extremely positive, since most of the rest of the world believes the israelis have made an error not being more forthcoming with the government, and the u.s. vetoes it, which we will do because we're committed to israel's security and the idea that the two parties have to negotiate a solution, we've got to contain the fallout. because when this is over, the underlying reality won't change, and we still believe there shod be a palestinian state, and we still believe there should be coopetion between israel and our arab neighbors. so, i don't know what's going to happen. i just know that this is one of those deals where we're either going to go forward, or fall back, and i fav going forward. i don't think the fundamental
4:28 am
realities have changed in 20 years. >> mr. president, thank you, as always. good luck wi the cgi this week. >> thanks, david. >> and coming up, republican white hoe hopefuls rick perry and mitt romney spar over social security. the rest of the field struggles to beak through. meanwhile reports that democrats are dissatisfied with president obama as they suffer two stinging defeats in special elections this week. how will it affect his re-election chance? our roundtable weighs in. former michigan governor jennifer granholm, and republican strategist alex castellanos. also here, helene cooper of "the new york times." and "time" magazine's mark halperin. after this brief commercial break. [ male announcer ] when men don't choose what's right for their face, they can end up with shaving irritation. ♪ get gillette irritation defense shave gel and gillette fusion proglide razor to help defend against five signs of shaving irritation.
4:29 am
♪ try gillette fusion proglide and the irritation defense line. help defend your skin. ♪ while i took refuge from the pollen that made me sneeze. but with 24-hour zyrtec®, i get prescription strength relief from my worst allergy symptoms. so lily and i are back on the road again. with zyrtec® i can love the air®.
4:30 am
4:31 am
4:32 am
coming up our roundtable weighs in and there's a lot to talk about in terms of the race for the white house. joining me alex castellanos, [ wo man ] today i tamed the wild with the touchably smooth collection. a smoothing serum built right in for hair so silky smooth. ferocious hair, beware! [ female announcer ] touchably smooth, from herbal essences. ♪
4:33 am
4:34 am
4:35 am
dr. scholl's custom fit orthotic center recommends the custom-fit orthotic that's best for your tired feet. foot-care scientists are behind it. you'll get all-day relief. for your tired achy feet. for locations, see thank you...
4:36 am
we're back with our political round table. joining me republican strategist alex castellanos. former democratic governor of michigan and the author of "a governor's story: the fight for jobs and america's commission future" jennifer granholm and her book, right there side by side. white house correspondent for "the new york times" helene cooper, and senior litical analyst for "time" magazine,
4:37 am
mark halperin. welcome to all of you. so here we have an economic debate about jobs, and the deficit, in the middle of a presidential campaign. mark halperin, a president in trouble because of the economy. and here come the republicans, with big internal battlesoing on, but they're making their charge for the nomination. so the question that i asked former president clinton i think is most germane which is can this president be reelected? he says, yes, after a pause, if, and there's a lot of ifs there. >> there are. i think he's still the front-runner to be re-elected until a publican emerg clearly capable of taking him on. the environment is horrible. and the current fight he's in over getting the econy back on track and reducing the deficit, i think he does not have a very strong hand. republicans don't like him or trust him, so getting a deal with them will be very difficult. they're not afraid of him. theye not even afraid to take him on as mitch mcconnell did earlier on the program. even there they're willing to stand and fight. >> look, the republican lick is more than half in a "new york times" poll said job creation is the priority.
4:38 am
45% in a bloomberg poll blame republicans for what's not working in washington. the president's going to get ready and really campaign against them, just like you heard president clinton say, if the republicans are the ones standing in the way. >> yes, he is. and i wouldn't advise him to do that. because, the president is running, i think, a very strange campaign for re-election. he is running around the country, in fact, declaring his own impotence. saying that i'm weak, i can't get anything done in washington, mommy, mommy, please make these republicans play fair. and i think one of the reasons you're seeing him sink in the polls, the president is supposed to be the head of the political household. he's supposed to be the parent. he's supposed to be the one who settles everything down, gets things done. and in a perverse way, you know, the guy who was hoping change and larger than life is diminishing himself, and weakness is the one thing you can't tolerate when the world seems to be coming apart at the seems, when the economy is falling apart. >> helene cooper, you cover the white house, you're reporting on this every day. i talked to some republicans and
4:39 am
democrats on the hill so said this seems like more of a political exercise, this jobs bill, than anything else. they haven't dropped the bill, by the way, they haven't introduced t legislation. and former president clinton is saying this is the key. . >> i think they know that the chance of it passing are not very high. although, one of the reasons they haven't dropped the jobs bill yet in congress is because president obama decided that he needed to go out and try to sell it first to the american public. but his whole calculation is to hang this failed jobs bill around the republicans, the congressional republicans, that they refused to do something. they are calculating within the white house that voters are not going to tolerate congress not doing anything. so in a lot of ways, he's saying come on, give me your best shot. but if you guys aren't going to do anything i'm going to hang this around you during the presidential campaign. and that's part of the entire political calculus, which is why president clinton, during your interview, responded, yes, he can win again if, you know, the public ends up blaming the republicans for not doing anything on this.
4:40 am
th's a whole white house calculation. >> people are getting poorer in america, they feel worse off than they did several years ago. and washington's not working. pretty tough to run a re-election campaign in those conditions. >> well, i happened to write a book about this, where i ran in the state that had the highest unemployment rate in the country, very difficult because the economy was changing in michigan and yet it's all about a choice and i won by one of the largest number of votes ever fast for governor. so he can do this. it's got to be a clear contract. but here's what i think is critical in what bill clinton says, he's got to put stuff out there that works. that works, and the economy has changed because of the loss of the traditional middle class jobs. it's not the same old solutions that will work anymore. you need to make sure it's timing. all the solutions toreation of jobs in america. what the republicans have done is say we should just have tax cuts. but what are businesses doing with that extra money? global businesses are investing where they think they can
4:41 am
increase their margins, and that's overseas. so he's adopting a plan that will create american jobs, both in the public and the private sector. and that's exactly what he needs to trumpet. i just say if the republicans continue to say no to this reasonable plan, game on. >> a little bit of a problem. the american people have televisions. and the internet. and they can see what's going on and they know what we know, that this plan was really never designed, "a," to pass, or "b," to work. this is not the american jobs act. this is the obama jobs act. and so they see this, and you look at surveys now, and over 50% of the american people think this thing is not going to help the economy. this is campaign 2012, not fixing the economy. >> the question is whether it could be ultimately vindicated if, you know, laying out -- and also tapping into the frustrationf americans, that they feel because they want to get something done. before we go to products, mark halperin, this book making a lot of waves in washington this weekend, it's about to come out, and it talks about a lot of
4:42 am
rancor in the white house, that it's not a good place for women, there's a lot of disputes, and a lot of those disputes centering on what would bill clinton have done. we know what the undercurrents are like already with former clinton advisers working in this administration. here's one piece of the book that i'll put up on the screen, over the past few months, national economic council chair larry summers has said this in a stage whis ter to omb director peter orszag and others as they left the morning economics briefings, i mean it summer stressed, we're home alone, there's no adults in charge. clinton would never have made these mistakes. >> well, what governor granholm said i think is the key to our current substantive problem, not political problem. which is the economy has changed d we need a president who can direct the country, leave the country to some place and say here's how we're going to have jobs in the new che. there's no one better at that than bill clinton. president obama has shown one weakness throughout his time in national life is he has not been a grat explainer in chief about the new economy and how his policies will actually make things come about. its the same on this jobs bill. if you break it down, the
4:43 am
individual elements are popular in most cases. it doesn't have, though, the public support it would need and the congressional support it would need if the president could explain this is why this will work. he does not have, the polls show, credibility on that. >> helene, is there a broader vision for the economy that the president goes out and runs on? >> i think there is. and he's -- he's put that out there with his jobs proposal. he said, these are the things, i think, we need to do. but he's very much hampered by the political reality of where we are right now. that said, i wouldn't -- i was out on the campaign -- not the campaign trail. that's a very -- but i was out with him this week as he went to try to pass his jobs bill in columbus, ohio, and in raleigh, north carolina, and i was stluk for the first time, i've been going to these events with president obama, for the first time you really saw the energy of the 2008 campaign. you saw president obama -- you saw obama the candidate, and i started, because you know, when
4:44 am
james carville talks about panic, you're in the white house, and there isefinitely a feeling of people, that this, a lot is coming apart. but, throughout all of this, president obama himself seems supremely confident that, you know, he's got this. and there's this level, i think, you know some people call it arrogance, some people canall it self-confidence, but there is very much a level, he thinks when it comes time to bring it home in 2012, he can do it. you saw a lot of that on the trail this week. >> what you're also seeing on the republican side, alex, is special elections. anthony weiner's district, it went to a republican. and the back and forth. whether you can nationalize these results. what do you take away from that? >> interesting, two special elections. the one in nevada tells you something. this was an election that a district that mccain won by 88 tes, a republican just won it by 20%. those are numbers like virginia, where, like in a republican governor, like in new jersey
4:45 am
where chris christie won, where scott brown won, again, that's kind of a seismic shift. and in new york, president obama was a huge factor and so was the economy, about 40% of the voters there said that their vote was a vote to send obama a message. some of them were republicans. but some were democrats trying to help their president and save their president and tell him he needs to get going on the economy. but the big news here is that, there's trouble now for obama within his base. his base, he has economic concerns, but now he also has foreign policy concerns. jewish voters are concerned that he is, i think, 15 to 45 more pro-palestinian than he is pro-israeli. >> right. republicans talk about the jewish vote going to republicans for a long time. it never happened. so that may be -- i want to talk about rick perry. >> until this week. >> well, we'll see. rick perry. you talked to him again, for "time" magazine, and i want to put an exchange up, because this is interesting. the dynamic between him and romney plays out in part on this
4:46 am
answer. you asked, do you feel pressure to temper some of yur rhetoric, like calling the obama administration socialist? he says, no. i still believe they are socialist. their policies prove that almost daily. look, when all the answers emanate from washington, d.c., one size fits all, whether it's education policy or whether it's health care policy, that is on its face socialism. this is wherehe fight between him and romney is going to play out. >> in the end, a lot of people think that romney will be the nominee because there's just too much roughness, too many questions about rick perry. when i interviewed him, our assumption was that he would use the opportunity to try to speak to that audience, mostly an establishment audience and say i have strong views, but i can be a little bit more reserved. he didn't back off at all. he said, socialist administration, social security is a ponzi scheme. he is not going to back off. and in romney world they look at that and say, this is going to be even easierhan we thought. the guy is doubling, tripling down on everything, stylistically, as well. that's the fight. and if rick perry is right about the nature of the republican
4:47 am
electorate, that it is a tea party electorate, different than the establishment that's dominated in the past, he will win, even with rhetoric like that. >> quickly democratic governor formerly of michigan, how do you size up this race? >> i think th race is all going to be about obama out there fighting for jobs. and putting this in a global context. our economic competitors globally are out there poaching jobs. we have got to get an active, smart, government. but an active government. not a big government. what he's preparing is to treat jobs in america, and the fight is really a war o jobs. "the new york tim" had a column on this yesterday which was very on point. we need to worry about the war, globally on jobs. >> we're going to take a break here. and we're going to come back with our takeaway as we look at what was said here today. what to look for in the coming weeks. plus what are the hot political stories trending this morning? [ male announcer ] these are volunteers...
4:48 am
our neighbors putting their lives on the line. and when they rely on a battery, there are firefighters everywhere who trust duracell. so, look for these special packs to see how you can help your local volunteers. duracell. trusted everywhere.
4:49 am
4:50 am
4:51 am
our remaining moments request our roundtable now, and a key takeway from our interview with president bill clinton. my question about politics. >> if unemployment does not come down significantly from 9.1%,
4:52 am
you know the history, can this president be re-elected? >> yes, if people believe that he had a credible plan, and the republicans thwarted it, either becau they were wrong or they just wanted to beat him. that's the problem they're facing. >> the problem that republicans are facing, alex, is that if they don't deal with the demand that the public has to do something, they could look like they've stood in the way. >> they could. let me take a huge pause here like president clinton just did, thinking about if there's a way president obama can get reelected. yes, republicans have that challenge. and they have other challenges. rick perry, for example, has bolted into the lead on the republican side because he's demonstrated strength and certainty, and is close to the republican base. in doing so, however, he has demonstrated, i think, a certain thoughtlessness or ecklessness, he's like the guy who flattens his foot on the accelerator trying to park his car. he's just a little too aggressive and that is scaring some republicans. he's dropped from a 3% lead over
4:53 am
president obama to 7 points behind in some surveys now. so the republican field has its own challenges. >> want to go to ourtrend tracker for the big stories that we're following this morning. if you look at it, president obama tax plan out this morning that we got retion to. also this united natns shwdown, helene. this is about the palestinians bringing up a vote for statehood in the general assembly. we know the united states ll block this, but the fallout. is there concern in the administration that the region could blow up, literally? >> there really is. and the concern is not only that the region could blow up. that is less of that. it's more of the position that this u.s. vote could put -- puts the united states in. because the last thing that the obama administration wants to do right now, in the middle of the air an spring, when they've been talking about the aspirations for all these, you know, the democratic aspirations throughout the arab world, is to be seen as if they're standing in the way and vetoing a vote that's directly to this democratic aspirations of the palestinian people. that's one of the reasons why they're trying so hard, even still, to stop this.
4:54 am
at the risk of trying not to get too far into the weeds with this. but they still think that there's some wiggle room this week where they could maybe stop a vote from going to the security couil, which ishere the u.s. would have to veto it. >> all right. thank you. before we take another quick break you can read an excerpt of governor granholm's new book "a governor's story: the fight for jobs and america's economic future" on our website, as well as online. check out the weekly press pass as well. our conversation with nancy brinker, founder and ceo of susan g. komen for the pure. we'll be right back. [ woman ] jogging stroller. you've been stuck in the garage while i took refuge from the pollen that made me sneeze. but with 24-hour zyrtec®, i get prescription strength relief from my worst allergy symptoms. so lily and i are back on the road again. with zyrtec® i can love the air®.
4:55 am
4:56 am
4:57 am
it's real milk full of calcium and vitamin d.
4:58 am
and tastes simply delicious. for those of us with lactose intolerance... lactaid® milk. the original 100% lactose-free milk. welcome back. a quick programming note. you can watch ann curry's exclusive interview with iranian president mahmoud ahmadinejad at 12:00 noon eastern on msnbc. next week we're live from new york with a special edition of
4:59 am
"meet the press" as nbc news kicks off its education nation week. our guests will include the mayor of new york city michael bloomberg. and before we go, i wanted to mention a special anniversary this morning. our executive producer, betsy fisher, recently marked her 20th year with "meet the press." 20 years. after she graduated from american university, betsy came here, and made this program her professional home. the rest is history, and what history it has been. she came of age professionally, working with tim russert, of course, becoming his executive producer nine years ago. and then skillfully and sensitively managed the very delicate transition around here after tim's death, working with tom brokaw and now me. betsy's love of politics, her judgment, and her journalistic excellence defined her success. we couldn't ask for a better leader. speak for all my colleagues at nbc news wn i say congratulations, betsy. and we've been keeping that from her all morning


info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on